Products/ AI Governance Diagnostic + Board Toolkit
Route 2 · organisational product
AI Governance Diagnostic + Board Toolkit
A scored diagnostic of your own organisation's AI governance — and the board papers to act on what it finds.
£1,950 per organisation
Who it’s for
Boards and executive teams who need to know exactly where their AI governance stands — and be able to show it.
The problem it solves
Most boards cannot answer a simple question: where does our AI governance actually stand? This product answers it properly — the complete diagnostic with a graded report, and the toolkit to start closing what it finds.
What’s inside
The scored governance questionnaire, quality-reviewed by LRA before your report is issued
Your scored diagnostic report — where your governance stands, dimension by dimension
The board paper — the findings written up for the meeting that has to act on them
AI policy draft — a starting policy your board can adopt and adapt
AI inventory register — every AI system in use, recorded in one place
Risk-tiering guide — which systems need which level of oversight
A fully worked fictional diagnostic — a complete scored report for a fictional organisation, so the depth can be judged before you buy
Also included
Group readout clinic — a capped-place session on what reports like yours usually mean, and what to do first
One re-score within 12 months, so the board can evidence movement
The guarantee
Fit: if this product isn't right for your organisation, tell us within 14 days of purchase and we refund it in full. What is guaranteed is fit and delivery — never an outcome. No kit, diagnostic or briefing can make an organisation compliant or successful, and none of ours claims to.
Delivery: if anything you have bought fails to arrive, or fails to work as described, we fix it or refund it. That part carries no time limit.
Completion: for this product the fit window closes when your scored report is generated. If the diagnostic is not right for your organisation, say so before the report exists and the refund stands in full until then.
Licence covers one organisation for 12 months from purchase, including legal-position updates.
50% of every product's price is credited against a bespoke engagement started within 90 days of purchase — the product is a down-payment on the work, never a dead end.
The honest objection
Can a questionnaire really diagnose our governance?
Only up to a point — and the limits are published with this product, in plain English, before you buy: what the diagnostic can see, and what it cannot. Judge the depth from the sample scored report. Where the honest answer is that your organisation needs people in the room, that is the bespoke route — and 50% of this price is credited toward it if you start within 90 days.
Judge it before you buy
The scoring logic is published in plain English, including a limits section stating what a questionnaire cannot diagnose. No score is issued that the method does not explain.
Free sample: a redacted scored diagnostic report for a fictional organisation — the real report format, end to end.
Inside the artefact
Sample · the scored report
Northgate Housing Group (fictional) — AI Governance Diagnostic: Scored Report
Reported band: A — Foundations to build first · Overall score 92/240.
Your raw score placed you in Band B (Taking shape, gaps to close). Your reported band is A, capped by two red flags: RF4 (a high-risk system in live use without real human oversight) and RF5 (a serious incident handled outside your incident process).
Sample · dimension by dimension
The eight dimensions, scored
D1 Inventory: 15/30 (50%) — Developing
D2 Accountability: 13/30 (43%) — Developing
D3 Risk classification: 10/30 (33%) — Developing
D4 Data governance: 16/30 (53%) — Developing
D5 Human oversight: 8/30 (27%) — Exposed
D6 Transparency: 10/30 (33%) — Developing
D7 Monitoring & incidents: 7/30 (23%) — Exposed
D8 People & policy: 13/30 (43%) — Developing
Sample · the board paper
AI Governance Diagnostic: Results, Risks and Decisions Required
Decisions sought: to note the result and red flags; to approve the recommended response route; to agree the reporting rhythm and re-score.
We recommend Option 2, with one element of Option 3 brought into the first 30 days: legal advice on AI-01 runs alongside, not instead of, remediation — because the exposure is live now, and because most remaining actions are documentation and practice changes our own teams can make.
Spreads from the product's free sample pack. Northgate Housing Group is fictional — invented throughout; no real customer's data.
The sample pack is free, and it is not an instant download. Request it here: the request is stored with a receipt, and the academy team prepares and sends samples manually — this site sends nothing automatically.
Start with the self-assessment — £249
The full 80-question instrument behind this diagnostic, auto-scored from your answers the moment you finish: overall score, dimension breakdown, red flags and priority actions. Your £249 is credited in full against the full diagnostic if you buy it within 90 days. What it does not include is the quality review, the scored report and the board papers — those are this product.
An AI strategy and roadmap aligned to your organisation's goals
5-day intensive programme · Programme · In person · London
Fee by proposal · dates to your schedule
Taught by practitioners — instructor spec on the page
Request it on a purchase order / invoice
Most organisations buy this way. Send the request and it is stored with a receipt — a request, not an order: nothing is invoiced or charged from this form, and the academy confirms terms before anything is supplied.
Routes 1 · 2 · 3
Start with AI in Public Policy making and Governance: Strategic view
Illustrative image — generated; not real LRA learners or premises
Route 1 · Book training
Book the training
A guided booking, one decision at a time — the programme, who it is for, the format, your window. Delivered to your schedule and priced by proposal: no published dates, no published prices, because no two engagements run alike.
Thirty minutes with Hajre Hyseni, the founder. Bring the problem as it stands; leave with a scoped read, the honest options — training, a product, or neither — and a written next step.